BREAKING – Matt NAUGLE and I on same side of Connie Schultz issue!
Thu, Jul 2, 2009
I’m in this idiotic, farsical, straw man populated PR traffic whoring “chat” with Connie Schultz, who defends her effort to lobby her US Senator husband for federal legislation to save her job, and guess who pops into the chat…..Naugle. On the same side of the issue as me (as far as I can tell).
This is what happens when you come after the First Amendment, and bloggers, in a frontal assault. You unite polar opposites, even mortal enemies, like Tim Russo and Matt Naugle, to oppose you every single step of the way, from the moment you roll out your campaign.
Epic FAIL? Or EPIC WIN? You decide.
Tags: connie schultz, matt naugle, pd



July 2nd, 2009 at 1:50 pm
“I’m in this idiotic, farsical, straw man populated PR traffic whoring “chat”…”
Sorry you didn’t like the chat, Tim. My job is to ask some questions, facilitate some discussion, that sort of thing. And I don’t even get the “PR traffic whoring” comment.
Oh, well. Perhaps you’ll like one of the future shows.
Mike
July 2nd, 2009 at 1:59 pm
The reason you don’t understand that you ran a PR traffic whoring chat is the same reason your employer is losing revenue so fast you end up doing this nonsense in the first place. Which is why it’s not surprising you don’t “get it”.
July 2nd, 2009 at 2:06 pm
Just trying to have a discussion in good faith.
The tone of this reply tells me that’s not going to happen.
July 2nd, 2009 at 2:20 pm
“Good faith”? Please.
If you have a “discussion” in which your subject sits there and personally attacks two separate people, (me and Jeff Jarvis, which is good company to be in), refuses to answer anything other than straw man arguments you create out of whole cloth, as part of your columnist’s campaign to lobby the federal government to enact laws that extort people to pay you for what you do, while that columnist’s husband is sitting in the US Senate…..
…call me crazy, but that’s not good faith. Unless you acknowledge the facts of it. Which you plainly do not.